di Andrea Fasolini
Since I was
born, I have been told that guns are bad things. Surely they are. Why do people
keep shooting each other since everyone lives only once? The humankind is
definitely the most unintelligible race on earth. However, I have also been
told that nations that have a high number of guns per capita are, in some way, “worst”
than the European ones.
People keep
saying that these societies are violent and that if we allowed our citizen to
own guns , the democracy would be in danger. I have never been that sure about
this. Now I am going to explain why. First, a clarification is necessary. I do
not own guns; neither do I think that we should turn the world in some kind of
Old West. I am just trying to understand with you if there are evidences of a connection
between a high number of guns in a country, and the explosion of violence in
its society.
Surely, we agree that the easiest
country to talk about is the United States: this country has the highest number
of guns per 100 residents of the world. Almost ninety guns every one-hundred citizens.
Almost every month our media report on a shooting somewhere in the Us, and
every time the message is “See what happen if you allow people to own guns?”
If we looked at this graph, we would
agree with this interpretation. Although the number of deaths by firearms has
decreased during the last decade, the figure is still alarming. The conclusion?
Americans are only individualist who try to solve their problems shooting each
other.
Actually, the current situation is
highly more complicate. I would like you to take a look at this graph. As you
can see, the number of suicides in the Us represents the 60% of the total
deaths by firearms.
This graph
shows that Americans use their guns mostly to shoot themselves rather than kill
each other.
I am not
saying neither that America has not a high homicides rate, nor that Us has not
a huge problem in controlling the black market of illegal guns.
I am just
saying that American social-problems are bigger than we image.
The consumption of antidepressants
has considerable increased during the last years. There is, in this way, a
strict connection between the increasing of the number of suicides and the
increasing of the consumption of these medicines.
Furthermore,
I would say something about the so-called connection between the number of
firearms per capita and the number of homicides.
This graph
shows the first five countries by firearms per capita.
As you can see, the
fourth, Switzerland, and the fifth, Finland, are well-known for being extremely
pacific and cooperative.
Despite
this, these countries have almost a gun every two citizens.
So it
becomes clear that there is not a straight connection between a high firearms
deaths rate and the number of guns in a country. The problem, in conclusion, is
not the number of guns per capita but the education that people receive: in
spite of a mere fight against guns-owner, Us government should understand that
its citizen need formation programs.
This paper
tries to encourage everybody to be a little more humble. Judging a society
without understand its problem is not wise.
1 commento:
Are you saying that guns are ok if the government makes formation programes? You are forgetting the human variable because you can teach kids that guns are bad things but you can't control how they will use this information. I think that guns shouldn't be allowed to anyone except for those that deal with public safety
Posta un commento